State v. Crossen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the use of the doctrine as to primary evidence
• inevitable discovery does not apply to primary evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Stith
  New York Court of Appeals· 1987-03-26· cited 101×
• Commonwealth v. Benoit
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-01-06· cited 76×
• Stokes v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-12-22· cited 49×
• State v. Schellhorn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-02-22· cited 24×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-11-07· cited 20×
• State v. Morrison/Bartee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-05-22· cited 8×
• State v. Groda
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-01-30· cited 7×
• People v. Schoondermark
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1986-04-07· cited 6×
• State v. Schneider
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-03-09· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ball v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
• State v. Mickelson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-09-23· cited 41×
• State v. Fisher
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-05-06· cited 18×
• Alcorn v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1964-03-25· cited 14×