Skip to main content

State v. Cross

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 4606

Syllabus

R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)/consecutive sentences. Evidence in the record supported the trial court's finding that consecutive sentences were required and that consecutive sentences were not disproportionate to the seriousness of appellant's conduct or the danger appellant poses to the public.

Judges: Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.