State v. Crook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is also reasonable to conclude that a weapon such as a razor blade hidden in the cap would not present harm or danger to a police officer armed with a gun.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Valle
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-02-29· cited 39×
• In Re the Welfare of M.D.R.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-03-22· cited 9×
• State v. Mireles
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-11-21· cited 9×
• State v. Isidore
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2001-05-23· cited 3×
• State v. Verschelde
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-11-03· cited 1×
• In the Interest of: T.W.; Apl: T.W.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-10-20

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• State v. Dickerson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-03-20· cited 111×
• Wold v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-10-14· cited 27×
• State v. Alesso
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-12-23· cited 26×
• State v. Fox
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-04-03· cited 21×
• State v. Gannaway
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-11-05· cited 20×
• State v. Childs
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-07-07· cited 20×
• State v. Cavegn
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-06-27· cited 17×
• State v. Metz
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1988-04-26· cited 13×
• First Trust Co., Inc. v. Leibman
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-09-15· cited 8×
• State v. Dickerson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-07-24· cited 7×
• State v. Woodford
  Shaker Heights Municipal Court· 1971-02-04· cited 4×