Skip to main content

State v. Criswell

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 3793

Syllabus

JURISDICTION—POSTCONVICTION—POSTRELEASE CONTROL: The common pleas court had no jurisdiction to entertain the postconviction motion seeking relief on the ground that sentences were not imposed in conformity with the statutes governing postrelease control: the motion was not reviewable under any postconviction proceeding provided by statute or rule and the sentences were imposed by a court having personal and subject-matter jurisdiction and thus not correctable under the jurisdiction to correct a void judgment. The appeal from the judgment overruling the postconviction

Judges: Mock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.