State v. Criswell
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 3793
Syllabus
JURISDICTION—POSTCONVICTION—POSTRELEASE CONTROL: The common pleas court had no jurisdiction to entertain the postconviction motion seeking relief on the ground that sentences were not imposed in conformity with the statutes governing postrelease control: the motion was not reviewable under any postconviction proceeding provided by statute or rule and the sentences were imposed by a court having personal and subject-matter jurisdiction and thus not correctable under the jurisdiction to correct a void judgment. The appeal from the judgment overruling the postconviction
Judges: Mock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-01· cited 641×
- State ex rel. Cruzado v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court· 2006-11-22· cited 371×
- State v. BeasleyOhio Supreme Court· 1984-12-12· cited 332×
- State v. Harper (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-14· cited 319×
- State v. SchleeOhio Supreme Court· 2008-02-20· cited 247×
- State v. CriswellOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.