State v. Crisp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• state sentencing rules ordinarily do not present cognizable issues in habeas corpus proceedings unless exceptional circumstances are present; state court is accorded great discretion in interpreting its own laws

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Urbano
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1999-02-12· cited 240×
• State v. Peiffer
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1982-11-24· cited 18×
• Juneal Dale Pratt v. Robert F. Parratt, Warden, Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex
  Eighth Circuit· 1980-02-19· cited 17×
• State v. Duncan
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2015-10-23· cited 11×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Randolph
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1971-01-22· cited 130×
• State v. Country
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1975-10-23· cited 21×
• State v. Trowbridge
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1975-10-23· cited 8×