State v. Crisolo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that §§ 4.40 and 4.45 apply to DCs that are \predicated on loss of range of motion\
• noting that “when the only permissible view of the evidence is contrary to that found by the [Board], reversal is the appropriate remedy”
• reversing BVA decision and remanding matter to Board with direction to award 10% disability rating
• involving the 20% disability rating under 38 C.F.R. § 4.71a, DC 5295 (1995) — “With muscle spasm on extreme forward bending, loss of lateral spine motion, unilateral, in standing position”
• reversal is the appropriate remedy when the only permissible view of the evidence is contrary to the Board’s decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).