Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/1/1995
State v. Crider
Citations
- 899 P.2d 24
- 78 Wash. App. 849
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating a defendant is automatically entitled to a new sentencing hearing when his right to allocution is violated
- no breach of plea agreement when testimony of witness called by State was cumulative of written report and corrected error in written report
- no breach of plea agreement when testimony of witness called by State was cumulative of written report and corrected error in written report
- trial court does not discharge its mandatory duty to allow allocution by shifting to the defendant the burden of requesting it
- once the sentence has been announced, the defendant is arguing from a disadvantaged position and resentencing before a new judge is required
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schultheis, Sweeney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SledgeWashington Supreme Court· 1997-12-11· cited 170×
- State v. HatchieWashington Supreme Court· 2007-09-06· cited 47×
- State v. SledgeWashington Supreme Court· 1998-01-28· cited 26×
- State v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-04-20· cited 25×
- State v. Aguilar-RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-08-19· cited 23×
- State v. SerranoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-05-18· cited 22×
- State v. TalleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-10-07· cited 21×
- Department of Social & Health Services v. MattsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-11-22· cited 17×
- State v. BeerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-02-12· cited 10×
- State v. HatchieCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-05-23· cited 10×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-11-19· cited 10×
- State v. BeerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-01-08· cited 10×
- State v. CanfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-03-18· cited 8×
- State Of Washington, V Johnnie Gerard BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-11-19
- State v. LeelooCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-02-22
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-02-26· cited 2,416×
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-04-17· cited 734×
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court· 2005-06-08· cited 422×
- State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court· 1977-01-07· cited 308×
- State v. LaneWashington Supreme Court· 1995-02-16· cited 186×
- State v. AumickWashington Supreme Court· 1995-05-18· cited 138×
- State v. MailWashington Supreme Court· 1993-06-17· cited 129×
- In the Matter of Personal Restraint of PowellWashington Supreme Court· 2004-08-01· cited 121×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of PalodichukCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-12-07· cited 66×
- State v. ChowHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1994-10-20· cited 49×
- In Re the Marriage of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court· 1990-09-10· cited 46×
- State v. NegreteCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-12-14· cited 45×
- Washington State Bar Ass'n v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1995-03-09· cited 39×
- State v. HappyWashington Supreme Court· 1980-12-04· cited 33×
- State v. CoppinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-05-16· cited 25×
- State v. BussCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-02-06· cited 22×
- State v. BauchamCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-01-26· cited 10×
- State v. MelosCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-01-21· cited 9×
- State v. DanaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-11-29· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.