State v. Creighton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant disclaimed an interest at the scene but testified at the suppression hearing that the pack the police searched belonged to him
• defendant disclaimed an interest at the scene but testified at the suppression hearing that the pack the police searched belonged to him
• the defendant’s disclaimer of ownership of the backpack that he had been carrying did not constitute a forfeiture of his privacy interest in the backpack

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Knox
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-05-26· cited 22×
• State v. Cook
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-09-22· cited 9×
• State v. Stinstrom
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-02-20· cited 5×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Tanner
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-11-17· cited 194×
• State v. Knox
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-04-26· cited 24×
• State v. Herrin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 24×
• State v. Bogart
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-11-18· cited 1×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-09-27· cited 1×