State v. Creekpaum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing 1983 legislative changes and consequences for cases where the original statute of limitations had not yet expired
• extension of statute of limitations for crime whose original period of limitation had not yet expired was not unconstitutional ex post facto law
• “[T]he extension of the statute of limitations for the offense * * * before the original period of limitations had expired, does not violate the federal or the Alaska Constitution.”
• for purposes of ex post facto analysis, criminal statutes of limitations are procedural
• extension of statute of limitations for crime of sexual assault on a minor before the original period of limitation had run was not an ex post facto law in violation of the state or federal constitution
• extension of statute of limitations for crime of sexual assault on a minor before the original limitations period had run on defendant's offense was not an unconstitutional ex post facto law under the constitutions of either Alaska or the United States

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).