Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/5/2018
State v. Crawford
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 2166
Syllabus
CRIMINAL - Appellant was not deprived of due process as his plea to robbery was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made to the trial court. The trial court was not required to inform Appellant that a jury verdict must be unanimous before accepting his plea.
Judges: McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court· 1980-02-13· cited 2,064×
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 725×
- Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-11-07· cited 483×
- State v. KettererOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-25· cited 306×
- State v. BaysOhio Supreme Court· 1999-10-13· cited 239×
- State v. FitzpatrickOhio Supreme Court· 2004-07-07· cited 198×
- United States v. Eric Charles Martin, A/K/A Mickey Milton ArringtonSixth Circuit· 1983-04-04· cited 140×
- Billy Joe Sowell v. Margaret Bradshaw, WardenSixth Circuit· 2004-06-23· cited 100×
- State v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court· 2005-05-11· cited 62×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-30· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.