State v. Crawford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the prosecutor's statements did not violate the plea agreement because the State specifically reserved its right to comment on the statutory factors and the State made the sentencing recommendations that it promised
• the prosecutor’s negative comments about the defendant did not breach the plea agreement because the State had reserved the right in that plea agreement to address statutory sentencing factors
• the prosecutor's negative comments about the defendant did not breach the plea agreement because the State had reserved the right in that plea agreement to address statutory sentencing factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ruff
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1993-03-05· cited 96×
• State v. Woodward
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2009-03-06· cited 83×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1993-05-28· cited 56×
• State v. Steadman
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1993-07-09· cited 52×
• State v. Urista
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-02-08· cited 52×
• State v. Wells
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1993-07-23· cited 17×
• State v. Foster
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-04-11· cited 13×
• State v. Barker
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1993-05-07· cited 9×
• State v. McDaniel
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1995-04-14· cited 8×
• State v. Kendig
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1993-12-23· cited 1×