State v. Crawford
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4892
Syllabus
The trial court properly dismissed defendant's postconviction petition for relief asserting ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court was not required to hold a hearing or appoint counsel before dismissing the petition because defendant did not present substantive grounds for relief. The arguments he raised could have been raised on direct appeal by his new counsel and were not supported by evidence outside of the trial record.
Judges: Siebert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 12,560×
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court· 2012-03-20· cited 4,115×
- Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2003-04-23· cited 3,337×
- State v. Quarterman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-09-23· cited 582×
- In re M.D.Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-08-10· cited 324×
- State v. CrowderOhio Supreme Court· 1991-06-12· cited 121×
- State v. BlantonOhio Supreme Court· 2022-11-10· cited 86×
- State v. BunchOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-29· cited 64×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-09· cited 36×
- State v. LloydOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-01· cited 35×
- State v. BolesOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-06· cited 12×
- State v. CanslerOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-21· cited 12×
- State v. CrawfordOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-26· cited 9×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-20· cited 8×
- State ex rel. Mobley v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-11-07· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.