Skip to main content

State v. Crawford

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2591

Syllabus

App.R. 26(B) application to reopen, ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, 90-day limitation period, untimely application, reliance on counsel, failure to obtain necessary records, and manifest injustice. The court denied an App.R. 26(B) application to reopen as untimely. The failure of counsel to timely inform the applicant of the court's decision does not state good cause for untimely filing. Similarly, difficulties in obtaining necessary records, either from appellate counsel or the clerk, do not state good cause. Claims on manifest injustice do not state good cause.

Judges: Klatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.