State v. Craw
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 1769
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in denying defendant-appellant's motions to suppress evidence because probable cause existed to issue a search warrant for defendant-appellant's travel trailer. The trial court did not err in denying defendant-appellant's motions to suppress evidence because the search warrant describes the items to be seized with sufficient particularity. The trial court did not err in denying defendant-appellant's motions to suppress evidence because defendant-appellant's pre-Miranda statements are admissible under the public-safety exception to the Miranda rule.
Judges: Preston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.