Skip to main content
· 5/7/2018

State v. Craw

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 1769

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying defendant-appellant's motions to suppress evidence because probable cause existed to issue a search warrant for defendant-appellant's travel trailer. The trial court did not err in denying defendant-appellant's motions to suppress evidence because the search warrant describes the items to be seized with sufficient particularity. The trial court did not err in denying defendant-appellant's motions to suppress evidence because defendant-appellant's pre-Miranda statements are admissible under the public-safety exception to the Miranda rule.

Judges: Preston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.