Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/27/2019
State v. Craigen
Citations
- 439 P.3d 1048
- 296 Or. App. 772
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the defendant either failed to preserve or invited any error with respect to exclusion of evidence as to defense of extreme emotional disturbance (EED
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lagesen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.