Skip to main content

State v. Craig

Citations

  • 562 N.W.2d 633
  • 1997 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failure to afford defendant his right of allocution in sentencing hearing was not harmless error, although defense counsel spoke on defendant’s behalf; right to allocution was personal to defendant
  • “[S]entencing courts need only to be in substantial compliance with sentencing procedures in 10 order to satisfy those procedures.”
  • noting substantial compliance with the rule is 10 sufficient and discussing cases finding such compliance
  • extensive colloquy during guilty plea hearing immaterial to exercise of allocution right at sentencing
  • “The most persuasive counsel may not be able to speak for a defendant as the defendant might, with halting eloquence, speak for himself.” (quoting Green v. United States, 365 U.S. 301, 304 (1961))
  • failure to accord defendant allocution not harmless error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter, Lavorato, McGiverin, Neuman, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.