Washington Supreme Court· 12/31/1980
State v. Coyle
Citations
- 621 P.2d 1256
- 95 Wash. 2d 1
- 1980 Wash. LEXIS 1600
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that suppression is the proper remedy for violations of Washington’s knock-and-wait rule
- stating that suppression is the proper remedy for violations of Washington's knock-and-wait rule
- “[A] clear majority of courts, including the United States Supreme Court, [hold] that noncompliance may not be excused unless the police are ‘virtually certain’ the occupants are aware of their presence, identity, and purpose prior to their entry.”
- suppression required for violation of notice requirement
- suppression required for violation of notice requirement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brachtenbach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. VladovicWashington Supreme Court· 1983-04-28· cited 258×
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 168×
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGlothlenWashington Supreme Court· 1983-05-12· cited 94×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of JamesWashington Supreme Court· 1982-01-15· cited 80×
- Commonwealth v. HuffmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-01-19· cited 56×
- State v. HastingsWashington Supreme Court· 1992-06-04· cited 54×
- State v. MuhammadWashington Supreme Court· 2019-11-07· cited 52×
- State v. MyersWashington Supreme Court· 1984-09-27· cited 51×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-03-29· cited 48×
- State v. BarefieldWashington Supreme Court· 1988-06-16· cited 47×
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 42×
- State v. AmezolaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-08-17· cited 38×
- State v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-02-08· cited 30×
- State v. SakellsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-12-18· cited 28×
- In Re The Detention Of L.K.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-09-01· cited 27×
- State v. BerlinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-01-21· cited 25×
- State v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-07-23· cited 24×
- State v. JeterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-09-23· cited 24×
- State v. TierneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-05-23· cited 23×
- State v. IBARRA-CISNEROSWashington Supreme Court· 2011-10-20· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.