State v. Coy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• police officer’s statement that blood test was available only at defendant’s expense did not mislead defendant into thinking he had no right to refuse breath test
• police officer's statement that blood test was available only at defendant's expense did not mislead defendant into thinking he had no right to refuse breath test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gundersen v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1988-09-30· cited 17×
• State v. Herndon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-11-18· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Osburn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-04-16· cited 24×
• State v. Annen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-01-12· cited 23×
• State v. Freymuller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-08-09· cited 14×
• State v. Creson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-04-03· cited 12×
• State v. Baxter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-06-20· cited 5×
• State v. Downing
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-09-24· cited 3×
• State v. Burnham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-02-19· cited 2×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-05-05· cited 1×