Court of Appeals of Washington· 1/15/2002
State v. Cox
Citations
- 38 P.3d 371
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where an appellant fails to provide argument or authority, we are “not required to construct an argument on behalf of appellants”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court· 1995-09-13· cited 2,396×
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court· 1992-04-16· cited 1,592×
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 744×
- In Re AlvernazCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 381×
- State v. KnightenWashington Supreme Court· 1988-01-28· cited 61×
- State v. AcevedoWashington Supreme Court· 1999-01-14· cited 39×
- State v. Van WoerdenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-11-20· cited 38×
- Hurlbert v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-03-27· cited 30×
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-01-15· cited 30×
- Fusato v. Washington Interscholastic Activities Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-01-28· cited 28×
- In Re McCreadyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-04-11· cited 20×
- In re the Personal Restraint of McCreadyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2000-04-11· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.