State v. Cox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that sentencing court referenced, and thus relied upon, incriminating statements made by defendant after he had requested counsel
• concluding that sentencing court referenced, and thus relied upon, incriminating statements made by defendant after he had requested counsel
• suppressing statements where the “defendant was presented with two choices: (1) to await [the arrival of counsel] and forfeit the interview, or (2) to proceed with the interview without additional advice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Carter
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2004-02-27· cited 74×
• State v. Peck
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-04-29· cited 63×
• State v. Pontbriand
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2005-02-18· cited 39×
• State v. Noyes
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-06-21· cited 9×
• In re Allen
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2014-05-23· cited 4×
• State v. Jeremy Lambert
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2021-04-30· cited 4×