State v. Cote

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The action of the trial court denying the defendant’s application for appointment of an investigator at public expense was not prejudicial to the rights of the defendant.”
• \The action of the trial court denying the defendant's application for appointment of an investigator at public expense was not prejudicial to the rights of the defendant.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Carreno
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2005-05-05· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Washington County v. Day
  Utah Supreme Court· 1968-11-07· cited 10×