Skip to main content

State v. Cote

Citations

  • 143 N.H. 368
  • 725 A.2d 652
  • 1999 N.H. LEXIS 12

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding trial court determination 4 regarding witness recollection considering testimony as a whole, not in isolation
  • remanding for findings to determine whether the defendant’s right to a public trial was violated
  • remanding for a hearing to apply the Waller factors to the existing record to determine if the public was improperly excluded
  • challenged prosecutorial remarks were akin to a legal argument and were a permissible response to the defendant’s closing argument
  • challenged prosecutorial remarks were akin to a legal argument and were a permissible response to the defense counsel’s closing argument
  • preservation of objection to closing argument requires specific objection to be raised at the time of improper statement or within a reasonable time thereafter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Broderick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.