Missouri Court of Appeals· 12/28/1976
State v. Costello
Citations
- 546 S.W.2d 22
- 1976 Mo. App. LEXIS 2683
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- twenty days sufficiently recent to support inference that appellant was aware of lack of owner’s consent
- car was painted black and door lock was punched out
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Houser, Smith, Stockard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Alvin R. BustilloNinth Circuit· 1986-05-16· cited 139×
- Commonwealth v. HoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-11-10· cited 45×
- Interest of V.L.P. v. V.L.P.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-06-30· cited 13×
- State v. HarmonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1979-09-13· cited 1×
- In the Interest of: D.L.T.Missouri Court of Appeals· 2023-08-15
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ChevlinSupreme Court of Missouri· 1955-12-12· cited 55×
- State v. DurhamSupreme Court of Missouri· 1963-04-08· cited 54×
- State v. McLartySupreme Court of Missouri· 1967-04-10· cited 35×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri· 1969-03-10· cited 31×
- State v. TateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1969-02-10· cited 24×
- State v. DraneSupreme Court of Missouri· 1967-06-12· cited 22×
- State v. AguilarSupreme Court of Missouri· 1968-07-08· cited 22×
- State v. McCrearyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1973-12-18· cited 18×
- State v. EdmonsonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1958-02-10· cited 12×
- State v. BeckemeyerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1968-02-12· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.