State v. Corwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The statutory elements of robbery, presuppose that intent to deprive the victim of property is a necessary element.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Stark
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-06-15· cited 41×
• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-01-25· cited 32×
• State v. Sly
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-08-13· cited 20×
• State v. Hicks
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-08-05· cited 17×
• State v. Bloomfield
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2003-01-09· cited 12×
• State v. LeFaber
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-05-09· cited 6×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Wanrow
  Washington Supreme Court· 1977-01-07· cited 308×
• State v. Boyer
  Washington Supreme Court· 1979-01-04· cited 155×
• State v. Edmon
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-01-05· cited 61×
• State v. Cerny
  Washington Supreme Court· 1971-01-28· cited 59×
• State v. Mriglot
  Washington Supreme Court· 1977-05-26· cited 39×
• State v. Faucett
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-03-19· cited 20×
• State v. Tugas
  Washington Supreme Court· 1950-10-09· cited 8×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-01-23· cited 8×