Arizona Supreme Court· 9/28/1966
State v. Cortez
Citations
- 418 P.2d 370
- 101 Ariz. 214
- 1966 Ariz. LEXIS 306
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- new trial ordered because prosecutor argued, “[h]ad this been a weak case, the court would have directed us out”
- defense counsel’s comment, that “ ‘[t]his is probably the weakest case, and maybe the poorest job of police work I have seen in a long time,’ ” was improper
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Struckmeyer, Bernstein, McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 1966-11-17· cited 35×
- State v. CrumleyArizona Supreme Court· 1981-03-02· cited 19×
- Sivells v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-02· cited 15×
- State v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-12-11· cited 12×
- United States v. Donald John GambertFourth Circuit· 1969-05-07· cited 11×
- State v. BrydgesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-08-24· cited 10×
- Kellogg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1992-03-18· cited 8×
- State v. JuarezArizona Supreme Court· 1974-07-03· cited 2×
- State v. CrumleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-11-17· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.