Skip to main content

State v. Corpuz

Citations

  • 646 P.2d 976
  • 3 Haw. App. 206
  • 1982 Haw. App. LEXIS 137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court stated that in a different context the error claimed could have been destructive of a defendant’s right to a fair trial
  • court stated that in a different context the error claimed could have been destructive of a defendant's right to a fair trial
  • “Since the instruction was not prejudicial to the defendant and the defendant made no objection, he cannot now raise the question on appeal”
  • addressing prosecutorial references to race in opening statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Heen, Kanbara

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.