· 7/6/1995
State v. Corella
Citations
- 900 P.2d 1322
- 79 Haw. 255
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prior consistent statement not admissible under HRE Rule 613(c) because “the statement is not a prior statement which was consistent with the testimony impeached” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burns, Watanabe, Acoba
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.