Skip to main content
· 7/6/1995

State v. Corella

Citations

  • 900 P.2d 1322
  • 79 Haw. 255

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prior consistent statement not admissible under HRE Rule 613(c) because “the statement is not a prior statement which was consistent with the testimony impeached” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Watanabe, Acoba

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.