Skip to main content
· 3/11/1922

State v. Copelman

Citations

  • 110 Kan. 749
  • 205 P. 360
  • 1922 Kan. LEXIS 141

Syllabus

<p>syllabus by the court.</p> <p>1. Liquor Law- — ■Maintaining a Nuisance — Sufficient Evidence to Convict. Upon the charge that the defendant was maintaining a nuisance by keeping a place where intoxicating liquors were sold and where persons were permitted to resort for the purpose of drinking intoxicating liquor it is held that the evidence produced was sufficient to warrant the conviction of defendant.</p> <p>2. Same — •Nuisance—Sufficient Description of Place. A description of the place is sufficient which advises the defendant of the charge he is called upon to meet, and will enable the sheriff to identify the place in the event that an abatement is adjudged.</p> <p>3. Same — Evidence. Error assigned on a ruling in the admission of evidence held not to be ground for reversal.</p>

Judges: Johnston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.