State v. Copeland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he state sought to introduce the video and audio recording of the shooting taken by the victim on his body camera”
• applying section 165.540(1)(c) to “the video and audio recording of [a] shooting taken by the victim on his body camera”
• “It makes no difference that the victim also recorded a conversation that did not constitute a felony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Project Veritas v. Michael Schmidt
  Ninth Circuit· 2023-07-03· cited 6×
• Project Veritas v. Michael Schmidt
  Ninth Circuit· 2025-01-07

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• State v. Wolfer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1965-06-30· cited 27×
• State Ex Rel. Carlile v. Frost
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-03-31· cited 14×
• State v. Powell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-09-28· cited 14×
• Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon v. Posh Ventures, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-07-20· cited 2×