State v. Cooper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[sjeparations as for use of the elevator, for sleeping arrangements, and use of toilet facilities must not be viewed as separations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rios
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-06-29· cited 22×
• State v. Settle
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-02-28· cited 14×
• Harper v. Namco, Inc.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1989-01-10· cited 12×
• State v. Neal
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1985-01-29· cited 9×
• State v. VanSickel
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-07-10· cited 7×
• State v. Clay
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-06-18· cited 7×
• Sample v. Witt
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-04-08· cited 4×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Clyde Mattox v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1892-11-14· cited 1,086×
• State v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1953-03-09· cited 59×
• State v. Bayless
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1951-05-14· cited 46×
• State v. Daegele
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1957-05-13· cited 38×
• State v. Edmondson
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1971-01-11· cited 28×
• State v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1981-07-14· cited 25×
• State v. Feltrop
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1961-02-13· cited 23×
• State v. Quinn
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1966-07-11· cited 22×
• State v. Hobbs
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1981-01-13· cited 9×
• State v. Burkhart
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1981-03-30· cited 8×