State v. Cooper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s statement on plea of guilty that he agreed sentences should be served consecutively was invited error
• where defendant agreed to consecutive sentences as part of plea agreement and did not seek to set aside his plea or claim that he did not understand what \consecutive sentences\ meant, he could not challenge the exceptional sentence on appeal
• where defendant agreed to consecutive sentences as part of plea agreement and did not seek to set aside his plea or claim that he did not understand what “consecutive sentences” meant, he could not challenge the exceptional sentence on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re the Personal Restraint of Breedlove
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-06-24· cited 102×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Call
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-07-26· cited 65×
• State v. Meggyesy
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-04-27· cited 54×
• Personal Restraint of Thompson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-09-28· cited 16×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Thompson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-09-28· cited 16×
• In Re Breedlove
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-06-24· cited 13×
• In Re Call
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-07-26· cited 7×
• State v. Ermels
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-01-10· cited 4×
• State v. Dillon
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-12-24· cited 4×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Perkins
  Washington Supreme Court· 1987-05-14· cited 62×