Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 11/5/2002
State v. Coonrod
Citations
- 652 N.W.2d 715
- 2002 Minn. App. LEXIS 1235
- 2002 WL 31455255
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that appellate court cannot supply what the legislature has overlooked or deliberately omitted
- holding that failure to provide Spreigl notice was not harmless error
- stating that “penal statutes must be strictly construed, and all reasonable doubt about their meaning must be resolved in favor of the defendant”
- stating purpose of Minnesota’s 4 child-solicitation statute is “to prohibit any persuasive conduct by adults that might entice children to engage in sexual activity,” and therefore defendant could be liable for solicitation of fictitious child (quotation omitted)
- “The state must provide the defense with written pretrial notice of any evidence of other crimes or bad acts that it intends to present at trial . . . .”
- “The erroneous admission of [other- bad-acts] evidence can be harmless error if, based on a review of the entire trial record, there is no reasonable possibility that the wrongfully admitted evidence significantly affected the verdict.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Randall, Lansing, Harten
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-04-04· cited 25×
- State Ex Rel. Peterson v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-06-29· cited 12×
- Shaffer v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 2011-10-27· cited 8×
- Shaffer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2010-09-14· cited 7×
- State v. LevieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-05-03· cited 5×
- State of Minnesota v. Mark Robert MoserCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2016-08-08· cited 2×
- State v. GundyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2018-05-29· cited 1×
- Justin David Shaffer v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2008-08-14
- State v. Scott VogelSupreme Court of Vermont· 2022-01-28
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-03-31· cited 305×
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-04-12· cited 128×
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-02-08· cited 119×
- State v. BolteSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-04-14· cited 98×
- State v. FloresSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-01-15· cited 92×
- State v. AltonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-12-09· cited 74×
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-06-01· cited 50×
- State v. TibbettsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-07-06· cited 23×
- State v. OrfiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-01-25· cited 15×
- State v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1996-11-05· cited 14×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-06-16· cited 9×
- State v. KoenigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-08-20· cited 6×
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-02-28· cited 6×
- State v. McGrathCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-02-10· cited 6×
- Park Towers Ltd. Partnership v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-04-09· cited 4×
- In Re RappCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-01-16· cited 3×
- State v. FurmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-04-04· cited 3×
- Wanglie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-12-30· cited 2×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-05-27· cited 2×
- Opal Corp. v. American Family Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-06-28· cited 1×
Other cases named State v. Coonrod
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.