State v. Cooks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant's amnesia regarding the crime did not mandate that he be found legally incompetent to stand trial
• “[T]he Defendant’s amnesia regarding the events of the crime does not mandate that he be found legally incompetent to stand trial.”
• defendant’s amnesia regarding the crime did not mandate that he be found legally incompetent to stand trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kent v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-05· cited 11×
• Kiley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-03· cited 10×
• Ozbourn v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-09· cited 5×
• State v. J.D.O.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-19

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dusky v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1960-04-18· cited 3,197×
• United States v. Evelio Mota and Juan Flores
  Fifth Circuit· 1979-07-16· cited 68×
• Pridgen v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-08-25· cited 6×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-19· cited 4×
• Cortes-Rivas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-09-21· cited 1×