Skip to main content

State v. Cook

Citations

  • 187 P.3d 1283
  • 286 Kan. 766
  • 2008 Kan. LEXIS 393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failure to register is a continuing offense, relying on United States v. Gray, 876 F.2d 1411, 1419 [9th Cir.1989], cert. denied 495 U.S. 930 [1990]
  • recognizing proposition that all persons presumed to know laws of jurisdiction in which they live
  • stat-utory amendment to registry that increased punishment for failure to register as sex offender not an ex post facto violation
  • \We will not declare a statute unconstitutional as applied unless it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the statute infringes on constitutionally protected rights.\
  • \We will not declare a statute unconstitutional as applied unless it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the statute infringes on constitutionally protected rights.\
  • “[T]he principles underlying the Ex Post Facto Clause do not apply to protect [a defendant’s] failure to register after the amendments became effective.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.