Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 4/25/2000
State v. Cook
Citations
- 610 N.W.2d 664
- 2000 Minn. App. LEXIS 401
- 2000 WL 463003
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that the assessment of an informant’s basis of knowledge “involves consideration of the quantity and quality of detail in the [informant’s] report”
- noting that informant’s tip is more reliable if it corroborates future criminal behavior rather than innocuous details
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Klaphake, Crippen, Shumaker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 3,282×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-11· cited 207×
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-03-13· cited 183×
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-04-19· cited 133×
- State v. MunsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-18· cited 127×
- State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-05-26· cited 106×
- In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-03-13· cited 97×
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-08-27· cited 76×
- State v. McCloskeySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-04-06· cited 61×
- State v. RileySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-07-31· cited 58×
- State v. DoyleSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-07-08· cited 29×
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-08-13· cited 17×
- State v. CampSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-18· cited 13×
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-07-02· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.