Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/27/1999

State v. Cook

Citations

989 P.2d 474
163 Or. App. 578
1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1819

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

describing method of determining whether one crime is a lesser-included offense of another
\Summary punishment for direct contempt is necessitated by a court's need to suppress immediate disturbances in the courtroom so that justice may be properly administered.\
“[Jjurisdiction does exist to enter a conviction for an offense not expressly charged if that offense is one that is lesser-included within the offense charged in the indictment.”
an offense is a lesser-included of another if “one offense is necessarily included within the other because the elements of the former are subsumed in the latter”
indictment did not allege the element of extreme indifference to the value of human life merely because it alleged that the defendant caused serious physical injury to the victim
where trial court erroneously convicted the defendant of second-degree assault, an offense not necessarily included in first-degree assault, Court of Appeals remanded to trial court for entry of conviction of third-degree assault, a lesser included offense to first-degree assault

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Linder, Brewer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.