Supreme Court of Kansas· 8/13/2021
State v. Contreras
Citations
- 492 P.3d 1180
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- When reviewing challenges to evidentiary rulings based on a claimed Fifth Amendment violation, an appellate court reviews the district court's factual findings using a substantial competent evidence standard, but any legal conclusions are subject to unlimited review.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kansas v. VentrisSupreme Court· 2009-04-29· cited 179×
- Kansas v. CheeverSupreme Court· 2013-12-11· cited 81×
- State v. CarapezzaSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-08-22· cited 47×
- State v. DelacruzSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-03-02· cited 38×
- State v. CheeverSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-08-24· cited 32×
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-08-22· cited 22×
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-10-28· cited 21×
- State v. ContrerasCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-05-29· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.