Skip to main content

State v. Contreras

Citations

  • 492 P.3d 1180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • When reviewing challenges to evidentiary rulings based on a claimed Fifth Amendment violation, an appellate court reviews the district court's factual findings using a substantial competent evidence standard, but any legal conclusions are subject to unlimited review.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.