· 9/4/2012
State v. Conrick
Citations
- 375 S.W.3d 894
- 2012 WL 3791628
- 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1087
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[w]hen the issue to be decided involves the constitutional protection against forced,self-incrimination,” we “consider the court’s conclusions of law de novo”
- improper classification as a dangerous offender
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Martin, Mitchell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.