Skip to main content
· 9/4/2012

State v. Conrick

Citations

  • 375 S.W.3d 894
  • 2012 WL 3791628
  • 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1087

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[w]hen the issue to be decided involves the constitutional protection against forced,self-incrimination,” we “consider the court’s conclusions of law de novo”
  • improper classification as a dangerous offender

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Martin, Mitchell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.