State v. Conrad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• A deputy testified that the results of a deficient sample were accurate for the sample blown and that the result would have been higher had the subject filled the canister with his breath.
• A deputy testified that the results of a deficient sample were accurate for the sample blown and that the result would have been higher had the subject filled the canister with his breath.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Mazzuca
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1999-06-10· cited 9×
• State v. McIntyre
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2015-05-29· cited 8×
• State Ex Rel. Kutsch v. Wilson
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 4×
• State of Iowa v. William Edward Hunt
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2017-02-08

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Barker
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1988-02-23· cited 65×
• State v. Hood
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1971-11-02· cited 27×
• State v. Dyer
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1977-03-22· cited 15×