State v. Connor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he rule and its application depend[] not so much on the placing of the qualifying words, or whether they are preceded by the terms, ‘provided’ or ‘except’; but rather on the nature, meaning and purpose of the words themselves.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rankin
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-12-21· cited 74×
• People v. Sandgren
  New York Court of Appeals· 1951-04-12· cited 33×
• McHenry v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1935-04-06· cited 11×
• State v. Rankin
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-01-02· cited 9×
• State v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1916-02-15· cited 7×
• Static v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1908-11-05· cited 2×
• State v. Edgerton
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-08-06

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Call
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1897-09-05· cited 52×
• State v. George
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1885-10-15· cited 44×
• State v. . McDuffie
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1890-09-05· cited 31×
• Griffin v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1902-09-15· cited 23×
• State v. . Emery
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1887-09-05· cited 18×
• State v. . Peeples
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1891-02-05· cited 12×
• People v. Demousset
  California Supreme Court· 1887-01-29· cited 12×
• State v. . Crowder
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 1887-02-05· cited 6×