Supreme Court of North Carolina· 6/17/2022
State v. Conner
Syllabus
Whether imposition of two consecutive sentences which together make a juvenile defendant eligible for parole after forty-five years in prison constituted de facto life without parole in violation of the state or federal constitutions as applied to a juvenile offender found guilty of first-degree murder and first-degree rape and who the trial court determined was neither incorrigible nor irredeemable.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 2012-06-25· cited 6,816×
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court· 1991-06-27· cited 4,521×
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court· 2005-03-01· cited 3,523×
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court· 2010-05-17· cited 3,477×
- Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 3,384×
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,907×
- Montgomery v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 2016-01-25· cited 2,780×
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 2,182×
- Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1984-08-02· cited 1,064×
- Johnson v. TexasSupreme Court· 1993-08-09· cited 750×
- Jones v. MississippiSupreme Court· 2021-04-22· cited 377×
- State of Iowa v. Denem Anthony NullSupreme Court of Iowa· 2013-08-16· cited 303×
- State v. ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-10-26· cited 35×
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-05-11· cited 34×
- State of Arizona v. Martin Raul Soto-FongArizona Supreme Court· 2020-10-09· cited 27×
- State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court· 2017-03-03· cited 18×
- Sanders v. . EllingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1877-06-05· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.