Skip to main content

State v. Conner

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 1769

Syllabus

The trial court substantially complied with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) in its explanation of the \maximum penalty\ as to each separate, individual offense that the defendant-appellant pleaded guilty to, and thus, we find no error. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.