Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2/11/1988
State v. Connelly
Citations
- 421 N.W.2d 859
- 143 Wis. 2d 500
- 1988 Wisc. App. LEXIS 71
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant could be required to reimburse state for \buy money\ in drug case as a condition of probation
- restitution of drug money was authorized under statute allowing for “reasonable and appropriate” conditions of probation
- restitution of drug money was authorized under statute allowing for \reasonable and appropriate\ conditions of probation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dykman, Eich, Sundby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Stanley CottmanThird Circuit· 1998-04-21· cited 66×
- United States v. James DaddatoSeventh Circuit· 1993-06-17· cited 45×
- State v. HeynWisconsin Supreme Court· 1990-06-13· cited 26×
- Igbinovia v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1995-05-25· cited 17×
- State v. OrtizCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2001-08-22· cited 11×
- State v. Howard-HastingsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1998-03-31· cited 9×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.