State v. Connell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[E]videntiary suppression via motion should be ruled upon before, not affer, evidence has been admitted at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Missouri v. Kathryn Avent
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-04-01· cited 11×
• State v. Nebbitt
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-07-29· cited 7×
• State v. Triplett
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-12-20· cited 5×
• State of Missouri v. Landon Matthew Thomas
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-06-24· cited 4×
• State of Missouri v. Byron Parker Aston
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-06-24· cited 3×
• State of Missouri v. Cale D. Seymour
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-03-26· cited 1×
• State of Missouri v. Terry Nebbitt
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-07-29
• State of Missouri v. John Torrez Spencer, Jr.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-08-19

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Arizona v. Gant
  Supreme Court· 2009-04-21· cited 2,725×
• Sanabria v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 1,038×
• State Ex Rel. Coca-Cola Co. v. Nixon
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2008-04-15· cited 34×
• State v. Shaon
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2004-10-05· cited 16×
• Woodfill v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1994-06-22· cited 16×
• Riverside-Quindaro Bend Levee District v. Intercontinental Engineering Manufacturing Corp.
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2003-12-23· cited 11×
• State v. Seuferling
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-11-20· cited 6×
• State v. Vaida
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1993-04-27· cited 4×