State v. Conn
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 2757
Syllabus
CRIMINAL-POST RELEASE CONTROL NOTIFICATION - The trial court's use of the phrase \up to\ rather than \a period of\ when imposing a mandatory five-year term of post-release control did not render the imposition of post-release control void where the totality of the circumstances indicate the appellant was placed on notice he was subject to a mandatory term of five years of post-release control. In considering the totality of the circumstances concerning a trial court's imposition of post-release control, reviewing courts may look to other documents, such as plea agreements, sentencing hearing transcripts, and judgment entries that alone may be insufficient to properly impost post-release control.
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 1,066×
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-01· cited 641×
- State v. Grimes (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-05-24· cited 175×
- National City Bank, N.E. v. BeyerOhio Supreme Court· 2000-06-21· cited 54×
- State v. TriplettOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-25· cited 10×
- State v. BurnsOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-30· cited 6×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-09· cited 5×
- State v. ConnOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-21· cited 4×
- State v. BarteeOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-30· cited 3×
- State v. SullivanOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-23· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.