State v. Conklin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• voir dire question hypothetically raising defendant’s criminal record held not erroneous when intended to reveal prejudice in the event that defendant’s record is revealed at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rodriguez
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-04-29· cited 156×
• State v. Farrow
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1978-04-28· cited 45×
• State v. Jacobowitz
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-01-20· cited 43×
• State v. Osborne
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-05-31· cited 35×
• State v. Kitt
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1986-08-12· cited 27×
• Caldwell v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1980-08-28· cited 24×
• State v. Lemire
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1975-09-30· cited 23×
• State v. Gullick
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1980-02-14· cited 21×
• State v. Dayutis
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-08-15· cited 20×
• State v. Colby
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1976-12-30· cited 14×
• State v. Glidden
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-03-24· cited 13×
• State v. Dunbar
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1977-10-31· cited 10×
• State v. Wright
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-06-19· cited 9×
• State v. VandeBogart
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-08-20· cited 8×
• State v. Bone
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1989-02-06· cited 5×