State v. Congress
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4521
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B) application for reopening, untimely filed, failure to establish good cause for untimely filing, reliance upon counsel, ignorance of the law. The applicant has filed an untimely App.R. 26(B) application for reopening. The applicant has failed to establish \good cause\ for the untimely filing of the application for reopening by arguing that: 1) he did not timely receive notice from appellate counsel with regard to the ability to file an App.R. 26(B) application for reopening 2) detrimental reliance upon the legal advice provided by appellate counsel and 3) ignorance of the law. The application for reopening is denied.
Judges: McCormack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court· 1982-03-02· cited 2,744×
- State v. ReddickOhio Supreme Court· 1995-04-26· cited 212×
- State v. GummOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-22· cited 197×
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court· 2004-08-11· cited 173×
- State v. CooeyOhio Supreme Court· 1995-08-30· cited 117×
- State v. WinsteadOhio Supreme Court· 1996-01-10· cited 106×
- State v. LoomerOhio Supreme Court· 1996-08-21· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.