State v. Compton
Citations
- 178 N.E.3d 123
- 2021 Ohio 3106
Syllabus
Plea agreement term forfeiture money drug trafficking waiver statutory excessive fine manifest weight evidence burden proof. Because defendant's forfeiture to the cash was ancillary to the plea agreement and not R.C. Chapter 2981, she had no basis to challenge the court's failure to adhere to the statutory provisions for forfeiture. The trial court's determination that the monies seized from defendant did not derive from a legitimate source was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The record reflects that the trial court performed an analysis that included a determination as to whether the forfeiture was grossly disproportionate.
Judges: E.T. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court· 1986-02-19· cited 1,385×
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court· 1994-08-03· cited 143×
- State v. Buttery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-21· cited 53×
- State v. GlantonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-06· cited 16×
- State v. EppingerOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-05-19· cited 9×
- State v. TrivetteOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-29· cited 9×
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.