State v. Comes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, “Assuming, without deciding, the district court acted under N.D.R.Crim.P. 35(a)(2), it was required to give an appropriate amount of advance notice to both Comes and the State prior to issuing the second amended judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Glasser
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-03-24· cited 7×
• State v. Neugebauer
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-03-24· cited 1×
• Comes v. State
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-06-24· cited 1×
• State v. Caspers
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2025-01-09
• State v. Erickstad
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2025-07-31
• State v. Hamilton
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2025-12-18

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Rueb
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1976-12-23· cited 33×
• State v. Gray
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-04-25· cited 28×
• State v. Peterson
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-10-04· cited 9×
• Comes v. State
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-02-22· cited 7×