State v. Comer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was not obvious error and stating that it was “reasonable to assume that the jury was not induced to focus on anything other than the evidence”
• “Although unable to assert personal opinion, a prosecutor may attack credibility by analyzing the evidence and highlighting absurdities or discrepancies in a witness’s testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Schmidt
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2008-10-07· cited 26×
• State v. Bennett
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-05-23· cited 24×
• State v. Weisbrode
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-02-01· cited 24×
• Rich v. Fuller
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-09-26· cited 21×
• State v. Ashley
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-10-20· cited 20×
• State v. Lewis
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1998-04-23· cited 13×
• State v. Bates
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2003-05-08· cited 13×
• State v. Moontri
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-10-24· cited 10×
• State v. Corrieri
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-02-07· cited 10×
• State v. Clarke
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1999-10-13· cited 8×
• State of Maine v. Corey W. Farley
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2024-07-18· cited 4×
• State v. Jordan
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-06-01· cited 2×
• State v. Doak
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-12-19

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. True
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-12-17· cited 231×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1983-02-17· cited 36×
• State v. Tripp
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-01-04· cited 18×